Victim Targets - Spouse Partner

Rabbi Fred Neulander became one of America’s most infamous religious figures convicted of murder after orchestrating the 1994 killing of his wife, Carol Neulander, in a case widely known as “The Synagogue Murder-For-Hire.” A respected rabbi and prominent spiritual leader in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, Neulander shocked the nation after prosecutors alleged he hired hitmen to murder his wife while maintaining the outward image of a devoted husband and community figure. The case generated enormous national attention because of Neulander’s status within the Jewish religious community and the calculated nature of the murder-for-hire plot. Investigators later uncovered evidence involving secret affairs, financial motives, and hired attackers who staged the killing to resemble a burglary gone wrong. The combination of religious authority, hidden double lives, and contract killing allegations made the case one of the most notorious clergy-related murder prosecutions in modern American criminal history.

Dr. Robert Bierenbaum became one of New York’s most infamous domestic killers after being convicted in the murder of his wife, Gail Katz, in a case widely known as “The Private Pilot Wife Disappearance.” A respected plastic surgeon and licensed private pilot, Bierenbaum was accused of killing Gail in 1985 before disposing of her body in a manner prosecutors argued exploited his aviation knowledge and access to aircraft. The case generated enormous public attention because Gail Katz vanished without a trace, leaving investigators with no body and little physical evidence for years. Prosecutors later argued Bierenbaum murdered his wife during escalating marital conflict before flying her body out over the Atlantic Ocean and disposing of it from a private aircraft. The combination of professional status, aviation-related body disposal allegations, and decades-long mystery made the case one of the most heavily discussed no-body homicide prosecutions in New York criminal history.

Larissa Schuster became widely known after being convicted in the murder of her husband, Tim Schuster, in a case that became infamous as The Acid Barrel Murder. Prosecutors alleged Schuster killed her husband during escalating marital and financial conflict before attempting to dispose of his body using industrial acid inside large storage barrels at the family property in California with the help of James Fagone.

Henry Jonathan Valencia, often referred to as Jonathan Valencia, became known in true crime coverage after the murder of teenager Nosiah Santos during a public confrontation that prosecutors described as emotionally charged and deeply personal. Investigators alleged the killing stemmed from a secret relationship, escalating jealousy, and mounting tension between the two young men before the fatal shooting occurred. The case generated major online attention because portions of the confrontation and aftermath were captured on surveillance footage and witness recordings. Prosecutors argued Valencia intentionally targeted Nosiah Santos during the encounter before opening fire in front of witnesses. The combination of hidden relationship allegations, emotional conflict, and public violence turned the case into a heavily discussed modern youth homicide prosecution.

Paul Edward Hicks became known in Ohio criminal cases after being convicted in 2025 for the 2001 murder of his estranged wife, Regina Rowe Hicks. The case remained unresolved for more than two decades before prosecutors finally secured a conviction, turning the investigation into one of the region’s most significant cold case homicide prosecutions. Born on July 18, 1955, in Willard, Huron County, Ohio, Hicks was accused of killing Regina during a period of marital separation and escalating personal conflict. Investigators later alleged he attempted to conceal the crime and avoid responsibility for years while the case remained unsolved. The eventual conviction drew major attention because of the extraordinary delay between the killing and the courtroom outcome, highlighting advances in investigative persistence, forensic review, and cold case prosecution strategies.

Kouri Richins became one of the most heavily discussed true crime defendants in the United States after prosecutors accused the Utah mother and real estate investor of murdering her husband, Eric Richins, with a fatal dose of fentanyl in 2022. The case exploded into national headlines after investigators revealed that Richins later published a children’s book about grief dedicated to helping children cope with the death of a parent, creating widespread public fascination and intense media scrutiny. Prosecutors alleged the killing was financially motivated and tied to marital conflict, property disputes, and life insurance concerns. The investigation quickly expanded beyond the poisoning allegations and into Richins’ business dealings, finances, deleted communications, and alleged attempts to obtain fentanyl before her husband’s death. The combination of an affluent family image, children’s grief book promotion, and accusations of secret financial pressure turned the case into a major modern true crime story followed closely across television, podcasts, social media, and online crime communities.

Waseem Daker became one of Georgia’s most controversial convicted killers after being found guilty in the 1995 murder of Delta flight attendant Karmen Smith and the attempted murder of her five-year-old son in Cobb County. Prosecutors argued that Daker carried out the attack as part of a long-running obsession with Smith’s roommate, Loretta Spencer Blatz, whom he had previously been convicted of stalking. The case drew national attention because of the violent nature of the crime, the lengthy delay before charges were filed, and the later disputes surrounding witness testimony and forensic evidence. The murder remained unsolved for years before investigators revisited DNA evidence collected from the scene. Hair evidence later linked to Daker became a central part of the prosecution’s case, eventually leading to his arrest and conviction more than a decade after the killing. The case later generated additional controversy after key witness Loretta Spencer Blatz partially recanted portions of her testimony following the trial, fueling debate around the conviction and keeping the case heavily discussed in true crime media, legal circles, and online communities.

Sarah Boone became infamous after being accused of trapping her boyfriend inside a suitcase and leaving him to die during one of Florida’s most disturbing domestic homicide cases. The case gained international attention after investigators discovered cellphone videos allegedly recorded by Boone showing her boyfriend pleading for help while trapped inside the suitcase shortly before his death. Nicknamed the “Suitcase Killer” by media outlets, Boone drew intense public fascination because of the bizarre circumstances surrounding the crime and her repeated claims that the incident was an accident during a game of hide-and-seek. The disturbing video evidence, volatile relationship history and Boone’s unusual courtroom behavior later transformed the case into one of the internet’s most heavily discussed modern true crime stories.